EVALUATION OF THE TRAINING PROGRAM FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT MAJOR AT CAN THO UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Authors

  • Le Hong Tuyen , Nguyen Minh Tan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59266/houjs.2024.448

Keywords:

Stakeholders, training program, evaluation, construction management, Can Tho University of Technology

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the training program for the Construction Management major at Can Tho University of Technology (CTUET). The survey subjects are stakeholders such as students, enterprises, and experts. The research data was collected through a survey of 59 students from the university, 20 enterprises, and 12 experts, using a pre-designed questionnaire, with the study conducted via the Google Forms application. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to measure the stakeholders' evaluation levels of various factors in the Construction Management training program. The analysis results indicate that the stakeholders highly evaluate the training goals and outcomes, with training goal scores ranging from 3.36 to 4.75 and training outcome average scores from 3.15 to 4.63. The assessed factors include Knowledge, Skills, and Level of Autonomy and Responsibility. Based on these findings, the authors propose solutions to enhance the quality of the Construction Management training program at Can Tho University of Technology.

References

[1]. Luat giao duc dai hoc ngay 18 thang 6 nam 2012.

[2]. Luat so 34/2018/QH14 ngay 19 thang 11 nam 2018 sua doi, bo sung mot so dieu của luat giao duc dai hoc.

[3]. Quyet dinh so 1982/QĐ-TTg ngay 18/10/2016 cua Thu tuong Chinh phu ve viec Phe duyet Khung trinh do quoc gia Viet nam.

[4]. Thong tu so 04/2016/TT-BGDĐT ngay 14/3/2016 cua Bo truong Bo Giao duc va Dao tao: Ban hanh Quy dinh ve tieu chuan đanh gia chat luong chuong trinh đao tao cac trinh đo cua giao duc dai hoc.

[5]. Thong tu so 12/2017/TT-BGDĐT ngay 19/5/2017 cua Bo truong Bo Giao duc và Dao tao: Ban hanh Quy dinh ve kiem dinh chat luong co so giao duc dai hoc.

[6]. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Longmans.

[7]. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. Multivariate Data analysis. 7th Edition, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2010.

[8]. [8]. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler.

[9]. Nguyễn Đình Thọ. Phương pháp nghiên cứu khoa học trong kinh doanh: Thiết kế và thực hiện. NXB Lao động – Xã hội, 2011.

[10]. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), The International Handbook of Educational Evaluation (pp. 31-62). Springer.

Loading...