SỬ DỤNG AI CÓ TRÁCH NHIỆM TRONG NGHIÊN CỨU VÀ CÔNG BỐ KHOA HỌC: TỪ CHATGPT ĐẾN CÁC CÔNG CỤ AI THẾ HỆ MỚI

Các tác giả

  • Nguyễn Thành Tô, Đàm Thị Diễm Hạnh
  • Nguyễn Vinh Huy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59266/houjs.2025.666

Từ khóa:

trí tuệ nhân tạo có trách nhiệm, toàn vẹn nghiên cứu, xuất bản học thuật, khung quản trị; mô hình ngôn ngữ lớn

Tóm tắt

AI đang tạo ra cuộc cách mạng trong nghiên cứu khoa học, mang lại cả cơ hội và thách thức. AI nâng cao hiệu quả nghiên cứu, cải thiện chất lượng phân tích dữ liệu và mở rộng khả năng tiếp cận thông tin. Tuy nhiên, những vấn đề liên quan đến đạo đức, tính minh bạch, quyền sở hữu trí tuệ và rủi ro liên quan đến công nghệ cần phải được quản lý nghiêm ngặt. Nghiên cứu này phân tích việc sử dụng trí tuệ nhân tạo (AI) có trách nhiệm trong nghiên cứu và công bố khoa học, tập trung vào sự phát triển từ ChatGPT đến các công cụ AI thế hệ mới. Thông qua phân tích mô hình của EU, Mỹ và một số quốc gia ASEAN và đánh giá tình hình này ở Việt Nam, bài viết rút ra bài học kinh nghiệm cho Việt Nam trong bối cảnh hội nhập và chuyển đổi số.

Tài liệu tham khảo

[1]. Almada, M., & Petit, N. (2025). The EU AI Act: Between the rock of product safety and the hard place of fundamental rights. Common Market Law Review, 62(1).

[2]. Avanzo, M., Stancanello, J., Pirrone, G., Drigo, A., & Retico, A. (2024). The evolution of artificial intelligence in medical imaging: from computer science to machine and deep learning. Cancers, 16(21), 3702.

[3]. Austin, E. K., Raile, E. D., Wallner, M. P., Peterson, J., Lewandowski, B., Sellegren, B., ... & Jorgensen, C. (2024). Broadening the concept of value in science and technology innovation policy: Reconsidering cooperative Research and Development Agreements as an expression of Public Value Governance. Public Administration Quarterly, 07349149241256037.

[4]. Bisoyi, A. (2022). Ownership, liability, patentability, and creativity issues in artificial intelligence. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 31(4), 377-386.

[5]. Boone, T. S. (2024). An Examination Of Certain Key Features Of The New White House Executive Order On Artificial Intelligence.

[6]. Bozkurt, A. (2024). GenAI et al. Cocreation, authorship, ownership, academic ethics and integrity in a time of generative AI. Open Praxis, 16(1), 1-10.

[7]. Chelli, M., Descamps, J., Lavoué, V., Trojani, C., Azar, M., Deckert, M., ... & Ruetsch-Chelli, C. (2024). Hallucination rates and reference accuracy of ChatGPT and Bard for systematic reviews: comparative analysis. Journal of medical Internet research, 26, e53164.

[8]. Daugherty, P. R., & Wilson, H. J. (2024). Human+ Machine, Updated and Expanded: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI. Harvard Business Press.

[9]. Filimowicz, M. (Ed.). (2023). China’s Digital Civilization: Algorithms and Society. Taylor & Francis.

[10]. Giabbanelli, P. J., & MacEwan, G. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence and participatory modeling to support paradigm shifts in public health: an application to obesity and evidence-based policymaking. Information, 15(2), 115.

[11]. Goh, W. W., Chia, K. Y., Cheung, M. F., Kee, K. M., Lwin, M. O., Schulz, P. J., ... & Sung, J. J. (2024). Risk perception, acceptance, and trust of using AI in gastroenterology practice in the Asia-Pacific region: Web-based survey study. JMIR AI, 3(1), e50525.

[12]. Han, W., Xu, J., Cheng, Q., Zhong, Y., & Qin, L. (2024). Robo-Advisors: Revolutionizing Wealth Management Through the Integration of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Algorithmic Trading Strategies. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN: 2959-6386 (online), 3(3), 33-45.

[13]. Jia, F., Sun, D., & Looi, C. K. (2024). Artificial intelligence in science education (2013-2023): Research trends in ten years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(1), 94-117.

[14]. Krippendorff, K. (2023). A critical cybernetics. Constructivist Foundations, 19(1), 82-93.

[15]. Kumer, S. A., Kanakaraja, P., Nadipalli, L. S., Ramesh, N. V. K., & Kotamraju, S. K. (2021, May). The Categorization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Based. In Proceedings of International Conference on Communication and Artificial Intelligence: ICCAI 2020 (Vol. 192, p. 411). Springer Nature.

[16]. Lincoln Y. S., & Guba E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

[17]. Liu, Y., Han, T., Ma, S., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Tian, J., ... & Ge, B. (2023). Summary of chatgpt-related research and perspective towards the future of large language models. Meta- radiology, 1(2), 100017.

[18]. Md Dahlan, N. H. (2025). Can ASEAN Build A Sustainable Data Center Future?.

[19]. MarketsandMarkets. (2020). AI Governance Market by Component, Deployment Mode, Organization Size, Vertical and Region - Global Forecast to 2025. Retrieved from https://www. marketsandmarkets.com/industry- analysis/ artificial- intelligence- regulatory-compliancemarket

[20]. Markowitz, D. M., Boyd, R. L., & Blackburn, K. (2024). From silicon to solutions: AI’s impending impact on research and discovery. Frontiers in Social Psychology, 2, 1392128.

[21]. Martius, F., Jansen, L., Struck, L., Arumugam, A., Geierhaas, L., Ortloff, A. M., ... & Tiefenau, C. (2025, April). Out of Sight, Out of Mind? Exploring Data Protection Practices for Personal Data in Usable Security & Privacy Studies. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-16).

[22]. Maslej, N., Fattorini, L., Brynjolfsson, E., Etchemendy, J., Ligett, K., Lyons, T., ... & Perrault, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence index report 2023. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03715.

[23]. Nasim, S. F., Ali, M. R., & Kulsoom, U. (2022). Artificial intelligence incidents & ethicsanarrative review. International Journal of Technology Innovation and Management (IJTIM), 2(2), 52-64.

[24]. Nolan, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence in science: challenges, opportunities and the future of research.

[25]. Nucleoo.com (n.d). The impact of AI on job quality and business efficiency. https://www.nucleoo.com/en/blog/ the-impact-of-ai-on-job-quality-and- business-efficiency/

[26]. OECD. (2019). OECD AI Principles. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/ goingdigital/ai/principles/

[27]. Pho, H. (2024). Investigating Acceptance to Conversational Artificial Intelligence: A Case Study in Vietnam. In Navigating the Circular Age of a Sustainable Digital Revolution (pp. 357-380). IGI Global.

[28]. Pulari, S. R., & Jacob, S. G. (2025). Research Insights on the Ethical Aspects of AI-Based Smart Learning Environments: Review on the Confluence of Academic Enterprises and AI. Procedia Computer Science, 256, 284-291.

[29]. Rai, D. H. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Through Time: A Comprehensive Historical Review.

[30]. Sharma, A. (2024). Advancing AI Understanding in Language & Vision. University of California, Santa Barbara.

[31]. Somers, M. (2023). How generative AI can boost highly skilled workers’ productivity. https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ ideas-made-to-matter/how-generative- ai-can-boost-highly-skilled-workers- productivity

[32]. Thaariq, Z. Z. A., Surahman, E., Jaradat, M. S. K., & Mellyana, I. M. (2025). Trends in Using Artificial Intelligence in Social and Natural Science Research. TAM Akademi Dergisi, 4(1), 101-132.

[33]. Thayyib, P. V., Mamilla, R., Khan, M., Fatima, H., Asim, M., Anwar, I., ... & Khan, M. A. (2023). State-of-the-art of artificial intelligence and big data analytics reviews in five different domains: A bibliometric summary. Sustainability, 15(5), 4026.

[34]. Thelwall, M., Jiang, X., & Bath, P. A. (2025). Estimating the quality of published medical research with ChatGPT. Information Processing & Management, 62(4), 104123.

[35]. Trương, H. (2023). ChatGPT và giáo dục: Tổng quan tình hình nghiên cứu trên thế giới và Việt Nam.

[36]. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, & Organization, C. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. United Nations Educational. https://unesdoc. unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379920. page=14

[37]. UNESCO International Research Centre on Artificial Intelligence. (2024). Challenging systematic prejudices: An investigation into bias against women and girls in large language models. https://unesdoc. unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000388971

[38]. Van der Elst, K. (2025). Foresight on AI: Policy considerations.

[39]. van Kolfschooten, H., & van Oirschot, J. (2024). The EU artificial intelligence act (2024): implications for healthcare. Health Policy, 149, 105152.

[40]. Valavanidis, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence (ai) applications. Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Campus Zografou, 15784.

[41]. Voss, W. G. (2016). European union data privacy law reform: General data protection regulation, privacy shield, and the right to delisting. The Business Lawyer, 72(1), 221-234.

[42]. Wang, X., Li, B., Song, Y., Xu, F. F., Tang, X., Zhuge, M., ... & Neubig, G. (2024). Openhands: An open platform for ai software developers as generalist agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16741.

[43]. Wong, L. H., & Looi, C. K. (2024). Advancing the generative AI in education research agenda: Insights from the Asia-Pacific region. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 1-7.

[44]. Yu, J., & Cooper, H. (1983). A quantitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaires. Journal of Marketing research, 20(1), 36-44.

[45]. Zhang, H., Lee, I., & Moore, K. (2023). Preparing teachers to teach artificial intelligence in classrooms: An exploratory study. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the Learning Sciences-ICLS 2023, pp. 974-977. International Society of the Learning Sciences.

[46]. Zhang, H., Lee, I., Ali, S., DiPaola, D., Cheng, Y., & Breazeal, C. (2023). Integrating ethics and career futures with technical learning to promote AI literacy for middle school students: An exploratory study. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(2), 290-324.

Tải xuống

Loading...