USING MIND MAP TECHNIQUES TO IMPROVE ENGLISH VOCABULARY FOR NON-MAJOR STUDENTS AT HANOI OPEN UNIVERSITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59266/houjs.2026.1465Keywords:
mind map techniques, vocabulary, test, questionnaire, interview, lexical skills, linguistic performanceAbstract
This study examines the effectiveness of mind map techniques as a productive strategy to improve vocabulary competence among non-major students at Hanoi Open University. Mind maps appear to yield promising results in enhancing language learners’ lexical ability by increasing student engagement, providing stimulation, and serving as an effective tool for developing other skills such as speaking, reading, listening, and writing. The research investigates the impact of the mind map approach on students' vocabulary improvement and overall linguistic performance. The data were gathered and processed through tests, questionnaires, and interviews. The findings suggest that mind map activities can significantly improve students' English lexical skills, especially in memorization and usage. In addition, the study features the positive effects of mind maps on students' motivation, involvement, and complete learning experience. The study thoroughly discusses the implications of these findings for English language teaching and learning, highlighting the importance of incorporating mind map strategies into the curriculum to promote effective language development and lexical skills.
References
Al-Otaibi, G. M. (2019). A Cognitive Approach to the Instruction of Phrasal Verbs: Rudzka-Ostyn’s Model. Journal of Language and Education, 5(2), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.8170
Buzab, T. (1993). The mind Mapping Book. BBC Books.
DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2008). Quantum learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan (A. Abdurrahman, Trans.). Kaifa. (Original work published 1992).
Farrand, P., Hussain, F., & Hennessy, E. (2002). The efficacy of the ‘mind map’ study technique. Medical Education, 36(5), 426-431.
Finocchiaro, M. (1974). English as a Second Language: From Theory to Practice. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. (TESOL)
Hatch, E. & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, Semantics, and Language Education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hendrich, J., et al. (1988). Foreign Language Didactics. SPN Pulisher, Prague.
Maden, A. (2021). Yazma ve söz varlığı ilişkisi [The connection between writing and vocabulary]. In M. N. Kardaş (Ed.), Yazma eğitimi (pp. 101-129). Pegem Akademi.
McGriff, S. J. (2000). Instructional system design (ISD): Using the ADDIE model. College of Education, Penn State University.
Scrivener, J. 1994. Learning Teaching: A guidebook for English Language Professors. Heinemann ELT, UK.
Shi, Y. S., & Tsai, C. Y. (2024). Fostering vocabulary learning: Mind mapping app enhances performances of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 634-686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2052905
Webster, F. E. (Jr.) (1994). Market- Driven Management: Using the new marketing concept to create a customer-oriented company. New York: John Wiley&Sons, Inc.
