SUPPORTING ACCOUNTABILITY IN OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION THROUGH AI-DRIVEN LEARNING ANALYTICS: A CASE STUDY AT THANG LONG UNIVERSITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59266/houjs.2026.1468Keywords:
accountability, artificial intelligence, learning analytics, outcome-based education, quality assuranceAbstract
Outcome-Based Education (OBE) positions accountability at the center of higher education by requiring institutions to demonstrate alignment between intended learning outcomes and verified student achievement. However, in practice, accountability mechanisms often remain procedural and fragmented, limiting their capacity to inform continuous improvement. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and learning analytics offer new possibilities for transforming accountability into a more systematic, data-driven process. This study examines how AI-assisted learning data analysis can strengthen accountability within an OBE-oriented program through a qualitative-dominant case study at Thang Long University, Vietnam. Drawing on institutional documents and aggregated assessment data, the analysis explores how AI-supported aggregation and outcome-level reporting enhance evidence-based decision-making. Findings indicate that AI-enabled analytics consolidate fragmented assessment data, identify outcome-level performance gaps, and support structured feedback loops linking evidence to curricular refinement. Rather than replacing academic judgment, AI functions as an infrastructural mechanism that strengthens the evidentiary foundations of accountability in OBE implementation.
References
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Dill, D. D., & Beerkens, M. (2010). Public policy for academic quality. Springer.
Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5-6), 304-317. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816
Harden, R. M. (2007). Outcome-based education: The future is today. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 625-629. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701729930
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Knight, S., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2017). Learning analytics for accountability and improvement. Journal of Learning Analytics, 4(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2017.42.1
Nguyen, T. K. C., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2026). Ứng dụng phân tích học tập trong khai thác dữ liệu trên hệ thống quản lý học tập và đánh giá nhận thức của giảng viên: Nghiên cứu trường hợp tại Trường Đại học Mở Hà Nội. Tạp chí Khoa học Trường Đại học Mở Hà Nội, Số đặc biệt 17A, 81-90. https://doi.org/10.59266/houjs.2026.1351
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
Siemens, G. (2012). Learning analytics: Envisioning a research discipline and a domain of practice. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 4-8). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330605
Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. American Association of School Administrators.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018). The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.027
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.