AN INVESTIGATION INTO TOEIC VOCABULARY LEARNING AMONG NON-ENGLISH MAJOR STUDENTS AT UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS-TECHNOLOGY FOR INDUSTRIES

Authors

  • Dang Thi Thanh Huong
  • Tran Thi Quynh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59266/houjs.2025.550

Keywords:

Vocabulary learning, TOEIC preparation, second language acquisition, self-study habits, teaching strategies

Abstract

Vocabulary acquisition plays a crucial role in second language (L2) learning, particularly in the TOEIC exam, where reading and listening comprehension skills are heavily dependent on vocabulary knowledge. However, non-English major university students often struggle with effective vocabulary learning due to inconsistent study habits and heavy reliance on teacher guidance. This study investigates the vocabulary learning practices of 50 non-English major university students, focusing on their study frequency, preferred learning methods, and perceived effectiveness. The findings reveal that only 15 out of 50 students engage in self-study at home, with 6 students maintaining a daily learning routine. Most students depend on teacher-assigned vocabulary, and their study habits lack consistency. The most commonly used method is rote repetition (writing each new word multiple times), while a smaller group integrates listening and contextual learning strategies. Moreover, 86.7% of students express dissatisfaction with their vocabulary knowledge, emphasizing the need for additional support and structured learning plans. These findings suggest that teachers should adopt more consistent instructional approaches, encourage independent vocabulary acquisition, and incorporate evidence-based learning strategies, such as spaced repetition, contextual learning, and thematic organization. The study provides implications for improving vocabulary instruction, promoting autonomous learning, and enhancing TOEIC preparation for non-English major students.

References

[1]. Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (5th Ed.). New York: Longman.

[2]. Diem, T. H. T. & Tran, T. X. (2023). Thực Trạng Học Từ Vựng Tiếng Anh Của Sinh Viên Trường Đại Học Kỹ Thuật Y Tế Hải Dương. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 528(2).

[3]. Elyas, T., & Alfaki, I. (2014). Teaching Vocabulary: The Relationship between Techniques of Teaching and Strategies of Learning New Vocabulary Items. English Language Teaching, 7(10), 40-56.

[4]. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition.

[5]. Nation, I. S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language (Vol. 10, pp. 126-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[6]. Nation, I. S. P. (2005). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 581-595). Routledge.

[7]. Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.

[8]. Phung, V. Đ. (2012). Nghiên cứu thực trạng và đề xuất giải pháp học từ vựng tiếng Anh của sinh viên không chuyên ngành tiếng Anh Trường Đại học Trà Vinh.( Báo Cáo Tổng Kết Đề Tài Khoa Học Và Công Nghệ Cấp Trường, Đại học Trà Vinh) https://tailieu.vn/doc/ bao-cao-nghien-cuu-khoa-hoc-cap-truong-nghien-cuu-thuc-trang-va- de-xuat-phuong-phap-hoc-tu-vung- tie-2153475.html.

[9]. Sakai, R. (2009). Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Size of Japanese Undergraduate Students: A Correlation with Reading and Writing Proficiency (Doctoral dissertation, Srinakharinwirot University).

Loading...