IMPROVING ESSAY WRITING FOR ENGLISH MAJORS THROUGH AN INTEGRATED INSTRUCTION

Các tác giả

  • Nguyen Thi Thanh Van

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59266/houjs.2025.547

Từ khóa:

Checklist, essay writing, reading and writing

Tóm tắt

The assessment of academic writing classes revealed that students’ writing skills remained below the expected standard, demonstrating that essay writing remains a challenging skill for university students. This study explores the impact of integrating reading and writing, alongside the use of a reading checklist to assist students throughout the writing process.  This research identified methods of reading that may enhance writing skills and formulated them into a reading checklist. Sixty English-majored seniors participated in the study, divided into two groups that read texts with and without the checklist. Data were collected via a pretest and posttest of essay writing, along with an in-depth interview. The findings indicate that the integration of reading and writing yields beneficial outcomes, and that the checklist facilitates students in effectively combining these processes. The most notable findings are (1) significant improvements in the post-test result of experimental group; (2) students’ confidence in the checklist's ability to enhance their essay writing skills, and (3) a report on students’ positive experience with the integration.

Tài liệu tham khảo

[1]. Alisha, F., Safitri, N., & Santoso, I. (2019). Students’ difficulties in writing EFL. Professional Journal of English Education, 2(1), 20-25. http://dx.doi. org/10.22460/project.v2i1.p20-25.

[2]. Cooney, A., Darcy, E., & Casey, D. (2018). Integrating reading and writing: Supporting students’ writing from source. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 15(5), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.15.5.3.

[3]. Cullen, P. (2017). The key to IELTS success. https://ieltsweekly.com/ product/ielts-teacher-the-key-to- ieltssuccess/.

[4]. Cumming, A., Yang, L., Qiu, C., Zhang, L., Ji, X., Wang, J., Wang, Y., Zhan, J., Zhang, F., Xu, C., Cao, R., Yu, L., Chu, M., Liu, M., Cao, M., & Lai, C. (2018). Students’ practices and abilities for writing from sources in English at universities in China. Journal of Second Language Writing, 39, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.11.001.

[5]. Grabe, W., and Zhang, C. (2016). Reading-writing relationships in first and second language academic literacy development. Lang. Teach. 49, 339–355. doi: 10.1017/s0261444816000082.

[6]. Graham, S., Liu, X., Aitken, A., Ng, C., Bartlett, B., Harris, K. R., & Holzapfel, J. (2017). Effectiveness of literacy programs balancing reading and writing instruction: A meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 53, 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.194. [7]. Hayati, M. (2014). The impact of CK on listening comprehension of EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 2(3), 144–152.

[8]. Khaki, N., Hessamy, G., Hemmati, F., & Iravani, H. (2013). Exploring EFL writers’ attitudes towards reading-to- write and writing-only test tasks: A qualitative approach. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 10(1), 47-68. https://www. earticle.net/Article/A201608.

[9]. Kim, Y. - S. G. (2022). Co- occurrence of reading and writing difficulties: The application of the interactive dynamic literacy model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(6), 447–464. https:// doi.org/ 10. 1177/ 00222 19421 1060868.

[10]. Kim, Y.- S. G., Wolters, A., & Lee, J. (2024). Reading and writing relations are not uniform. They differ by the linguistic grain size, development alphase and measurement. Review of Educational Research.https://doi. org/10.3102/00346543231178830.

[11]. Kim, Y.- S. G., & Park, S. (2019). Unpacking pathways using the direct and indirect effects model of writing (DIEW) and the contributions of higher order cognitive skills to writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(5), 1319–1343. https:// doi.org/ 10.022- 10117 - 9.

[12]. Krashen, S. (2012). Direct instruction of academic vocabulary: What about real reading? Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3), 233-234. https://doi. org/10.1002/rrq.018.

[13]. Kuehner, A. V., & Hurley, J. (2019). How integrating reading and writing supports student success. Journal of Developmental Education, 42(2), 20-26.

[14]. Lin, L. H., & Morrison, B. (2021). Challenges in academic writing: Perspectives of Engineering faculty and L2 postgraduate research students. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 59-70.

[15]. Mohamed, I. O. (2020). IELTS and IESOL as English proficiency assessment methods for native Arab students in a health sciences University in the United Arab Emirates. British Journal of Education, 8, 16-32.

[16]. Moses, R. N., & Mohamad, M. (2019). Challenges faced by students and teachers on writing skills in ESL contexts: A literature review. Creative Education, 10(13), 3385-3391. https:// doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1013260.

[17]. Quan, L. (2022). An analysis of the influence of Different Ways of Context Construction on the Teaching Effect of Intensive Reading and Extensive Reading for English Majors. Advances in Multimedia, 1-12. https://doi. org/10.1155/2022/6833203.

[18]. Saxon, D. P., Martirosyan, N. M., & Vick, N. T. (2016). Best practices and challenges in integrated reading and writing: A survey of field professionals, part 2. Journal of Developmental Education, 39(3), 34-35.

[19]. Wixon, K. K., & Valencia, S. W. (2011). Assessment in RTI: What teachers and specialists need to know. The Reading Teacher, 64(6),466–469. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1598/ RT. 64.6. 13 Supporting Information1007/ s1114 5- 018- 9913- y.

[20]. Weigle, S. C., & Parker, K. (2012). Source text borrowing in an integrated reading/writing assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jslw.2012.03.004.

Tải xuống

Loading...